Built for any deep-research question that needs evidence behind it โ multi-hop reasoning produces confidence-scored conclusions, each traceable through three tiers back to the original evidence. Started with company and industry investment research, and also fits open-web research like feasibility studies and competitive landscape analysis โ it doesn't make the call for you, it puts the reasoning on the table.
Not a single retrieval pass. When it hits an evidence gap, it keeps chasing and re-searching until the chain closes before delivering a conclusion โ the core difference from tools that stop cold after one pass.
Every conclusion carries a confidence score computed from evidence strength, source authority, and cross-source corroboration. How reliable a judgment is stays visible โ never a black box.
Conclusion โ evidence passage โ original source, expandable at every level. Every judgment can be traced back to exactly which passage and source it came from โ no unsupported claims.
Retrieval, reasoning, writing, and review are handled by independent stages that cross-check each other's output, reducing the risk of one stage's hallucination or bias flowing straight into the final conclusion.
Data and evidence access is exposed to developers via a standardized protocol โ usable straight from a browser or wired directly into code, no integration queue to wait on.
Single-company diligence, multi-company comparison, industry research, general research, IC memo, BP analysis, and pitch-deck generation โ covering the main deliverable shapes of investment research as well as general feasibility studies and competitive landscape analysis.
Beneath every conclusion and report sits a reasoning engine built to close the evidence gap, not to hand in a single search pass
Identifies the gap in the current evidence chain, generates the next search question automatically, and iterates until the evidence needed for a conclusion is largely closed โ rather than forcing a conclusion after a fixed number of rounds
Scores are quantified across evidence volume, source authority, and cross-source corroboration; low-confidence conclusions are explicitly flagged rather than blended in with high-confidence ones
Every conclusion is bound to its supporting evidence passage and original source at generation time, forming an expandable audit chain analysts can independently verify
Retrieval, reasoning, writing, and review run as independent roles that check one another, lowering the odds that a single stage's bias flows straight into the final report
Evidence and tool-calling capability is exposed externally via a standardized protocol, supporting both browser-based try-it-out access and direct code-level integration
Structured templates are preset for different delivery scenarios, so the same reasoning output can be organized as a single-company brief, industry study, general research report, IC memo, or other formats
Traditional research-retrieval tools hand you a pile of search results and leave the judgment to you. Thesora flips that: it hands you a confidence-scored judgment, plus an evidence chain you can check. Its positioning is "evidence and fact adjudication engine," not an advisor standing in for you โ the conclusion is Thesora's, but whether to act on it remains your professional call.
The full loop is direct: ask a question about a company, an industry, or a research topic, and Thesora reasons through multiple hops, progressively gathering evidence and converging on an answer with a confidence score and a fully traceable trail โ exportable as a single-company diligence brief, industry study, general research report, or other format ready for internal decision materials.
Thesora started with investment research in China's private markets, and also fits open-web research such as feasibility studies, competitive landscape analysis, and company deep dives. When used by institutional investors, it performs adjudication at the level of evidence and fact only โ it does not constitute and should not be understood as investment advice, and it does not replace any professional investment decision process.
Try a few tools in the Playground โ it beats reading another brochure
Start Generating Reports Developer Playground